I
sometimes forget how naive and uninformed most people are. Some
recent chattering on CNN concerning the Christopher Dorner incident
brought this back to my attention.
For
those of you who have been living under a rock, Christopher Dorner
was an LAPD police officer who was fired in 2008. I won't go into a
lot of details, you can get a high level overview here. Basically,
he felt he was treated unfairly by the LAPD and decided to take
revenge by killing some police officers and their families.
The
point I want to focus on here is how the whole incident ended.
Dorner was pinned down in a cabin near Big Bear CA, and was
surrounded by legions of police. Eventually the cabin Dorner was in
caught fire and was completely consumed. A charred corpse was
recovered, and as of the time of this writing testing is underway
to positively ID it.
Some
“controversy” has erupted over whether the police intentionally
burned down the cabin with Dorner in it. A couple audio tapes have
emerged that clearly shows officers directly calling for the burning
of the cabin. Quotes such as “Burn the fucking house down” and
“Burners deployed and we have a fire” can be clearly heard. Such
tapes were played on CNN.
Some
people seem shocked and appalled that sworn police officers would do
such a thing! I just have to shake my head...
I
will let the words of a veteran SWAT cop sum up what is common
knowledge among informed people:
When
I was on SWAT our view is that "We will always win....even if we
have to burn down your entire house by bombing it....we will win".
Period.
I'm
not saying that this is standard operating procedure in all
departments everywhere, but it is a highly prevalent attitude among a
large number of departments. I understand that the politicians in
various departments don't like this information becoming common
knowledge – but that doesn't make it less true.
It
has always been my position that it is better to know and understand
reality than to believe untrue things that may be comforting. I know
that this puts me in a very small minority, but what "is" and what "ought" are sometimes two very different things.
OK
– so what does this have to do with the type of stuff I normally
write in this blog? The point is to simply understand that
tactically, a flammable structure is not a defensible position. If
you find yourself in the aftermath of a major hurricane or earthquake
(or if the zombies rise), and you have to defend your house and/or
neighborhood from gangs and/or looters, you need to have enough
people to be able to secure a perimeter around any flammable
structures. Otherwise, someone will find your charred corpse after
the smoke clears.


Great. Militarized police forces firing on citizens. Obama would love this.
ReplyDeleteGood point, my plan during a disaster is to bug in, i dont want to be on the roads with 4 million other people. I will need to plan for this.
ReplyDelete