There
is a sub-class of firearms that I didn't mention in my earlier series on guns for home defense (HD), and this is the pistol caliber carbine
(PCC).
A
PCC is, as its name implies, a short lightweight rifle (carbine) that
is chambered in a caliber commonly used for pistols (9mm, .40S&W,
.45ACP, etc.). A couple of common examples are the Kel-Tec sub2000,
the Beretta CX4 Storm, or any of a number of AR15 platforms that have
been modified to use a pistol caliber.
The
short answer is that I do not like PCCs for HD very much, but they do
have one very specific important niche.
It's
important to understand that any choice you make regarding a firearm
for HD consists of some compromises. For example, handguns provide
the greatest flexibility and maneuverability, but this comes at the
cost of much less effective terminal ballistics. A normal rifle
caliber carbine gives up flexibility and maneuverability, but
provides much greater terminal ballistics. There is no free lunch.
How
does a PCC fit in with this analysis? Starting from the perspective
of a handgun, the PCC gives up flexibility and maneuverability the
same way a regular carbine does, but it provides only slightly better
ballistics than a handgun. The ballistics of most handgun cartridges
does improve from a 16 inch barrel, but not dramatically. Rifle
cartridges are still in a whole different category.
Starting
from the perspective of a carbine, the PCC gives up terminal
ballistics, but doesn't gain anything with respect to
maneuverability.
Additionally,
most PCCs are not made to robust “combat” standards. Now, I
don't want to get into all the vagaries of what this means, but
Glocks, AR15s, and AK47s are well known for being able to take a great
deal of harsh use and punishment and continue to run reliably. Many
PCCs are made much more cheaply and lack the type of reliability that
I'd want in a weapon that I'd be betting my life on.
If
all you want/need is the terminal ballistics of a handgun, then as
long as you train enough, the handgun will be a superior HD gun to a
PCC. If you want/need the terminal ballistics of a rifle-caliber
carbine, then as long as you train enough, this is what you should
choose.
Notice
my emphasis on training. The one and only niche where I see PCCs as
being superior to any other choice is if some emergency occurred and
you needed to arm someone who has little or no experience with guns.
Handguns require a great deal of skill to use beyond short distances,
and the muzzle blast of a rifle-caliber carbine is more than a lot of
non-gun people can handle. For example, after Hurricane Katrina
wiped out much of the Gulf Coast, there were many examples of
neighborhoods forming armed perimeters to prevent looters from
further ravaging their homes. In this case, I would rather give a
non-gun person a PCC and some basic instruction than try to get them
to be able to handle a handgun or a rifle-caliber carbine.
Lastly
– the whole PCC thing came from (as far as I can tell) trying to
make a civilian legal version of a submachine gun (SMG). For many
years the preferred weapon for many forces involved with clearing
buildings (military and police) was the H&K MP5 submachine gun.
Now, a submachine gun like the MP5 can be a very good HD weapon as it
has a few very good features – a short barrel of ~9 inches and a
rate of fire of ~800 rpm. The short barrel makes it significantly
more maneuverable than a full sized carbine, and the high rate of
fire increases its terminal effectiveness against unarmored targets
significantly.
If
I could start from the ground up and design the “ideal HD gun”, it would be some sort of suppressed, short
barreled, select-fire SMG. The barrel length would be ~9 inches, the
select-fire (probably a 3-shot burst) rate would be ~900 rpm, and it
would be chambered in something like the 10mm using ammo with a
penetrator designed to defeat level IIIA body armor...
… however
- in this land where my right to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed - possession of the ideal HD gun I just described by me or
any other private citizen would result in decades in a cage.
Interesting
how that works.


I like your idea of a ideal HD gun. How about a Colt 9mm, w/ 30 rd mag with 10.5" barrel and an Octane 9 HD suppressor. Of course don't forget to pay your 400$ in tax stamps and wait forever for permission from the ATF to do all this. All said I'll stick with my Glock 17 with attached weapon light. Yes, it comes down to familiarity with the weapon and training.
ReplyDeleteRule one of a gunfight – have a gun. I believe that this is also rule one of home defense – have a gun.
DeleteIf that Colt you mention was chambered in 300 AAC Blackout, then you are very close to what I consider the best HD gun reasonably available today. A buddy of mine is setting up something very similar to this (suppressed Noveske w/8” barrel). I hope to get into this class of firearms once they become available again.